(no title)
zuminator | 1 month ago
Windows is the same. By Microsoft removing all bypass measures that make it tolerable, their remaining user base will just end up being people who don't care about security and privacy, people who won't complain about being inundated with ads, AI, and bingware, people who have no idea that a modern operating system should be fast, customizable, and open. That 90% customer base is easy to fleece with 10% effort, so why bother with the 10% base that will require 90% effort?
elektrontamer|1 month ago
My mom works as a translator and all she needs is email, something to edit documents in and a browser, thats it. She was able adapt to ubuntu pretty fast even though she's not the kind of person who likes learning new tech.
There must be millions of users just like her. But people are very resistant to change and few have an annoying linux evangelist like myself in the house to push them.
We need to get them young somehow. I'm thinking around highschool.
therealpygon|1 month ago
encom|1 month ago
ykonstant|1 month ago
faust201|1 month ago
This.. but whenever this is mentioned people will start the other point. Google is not for privacy.
I have become a silent spectator.
faust201|1 month ago
Or gamers that are already used to Windows. So inertia.
moltopoco|1 month ago
esalman|1 month ago
franktankbank|1 month ago
tavavex|1 month ago
What a ridiculous idea. Any serious person knows that a modern operating system must, above all, be profitable, profitable and profitable. Caring about people doesn't make you any money, and since you already make up most of the market, it's not like you need to entice anyone over.
A slightly less provocative and crass version of the above, yet one that still conveys the exact same message, is probably what most of the higher-ups of the software world believe. At least the ones that call the shots seem to.