[johneth]

It makes sexual images of real people without their consent. That's what's breaking the law.

[chrisjj]

Is an image of someone wearing only a bikini seriously claimed to be sexual here?

Not by this article, for sure.

"The service prohibits pornography involving real people’s likenesses and sexual content involving minors, which is illegal to create or distribute.

Still, users have prompted Grok to digitally remove clothing from photos — mostly of women — so the subjects appeared to be wearing only underwear or bikinis."

[archagon]

Try doing that to your coworker and report back on how HR describes it in your offboarding meeting.

[tukarsdev]

Removing people's clothes without their consent is assault, it doesn't matter if, in another setting, where they did consent to it, it would be fine. It obviously is sexual if you look at the intent of people doing it. Not the clothing itself.