top | item 46492876

(no title)

croemer | 1 month ago

Be warned: LLM writing. Lots of negative parallelisms.

discuss

tison|1 month ago

This is the pull request of this post: https://github.com/fast/fast.github.io/pull/12

See comments like https://github.com/fast/fast.github.io/pull/12#discussion_r2...

Quote my comment in the other thread:

> That said, exn benefits something from anyhow: https://github.com/fast/exn/pull/18, and we feed back our practices to error-stack where we come from: https://github.com/hashintel/hash/issues/667#issuecomment-33...

> While I have my opinions on existing crates, I believe we can share experiences and finally converge on a common good solution, no matter who made it.

amelius|1 month ago

Speaking of which, why aren't the LLMs solving these low level plumbing problems for us yet?

croemer|1 month ago

Because LLMs mostly follow historical practice. And examples for bad error handling are more common (and easier) than good error handling.

alienbaby|1 month ago

What is it you are actually warning me of?

croemer|1 month ago

That it is mostly LLM words which some of us here don't really like to read as it can be low entropy in language, structure, ideas.

Lvl999Noob|1 month ago

Yeah. Certainly felt like that. On the other hand, the content does seem good. It definitely wasn't slop, even if I can't judge how useful it really was (in terms of giving a solution).