(no title)
intalentive | 1 month ago
This makes sense in a dynamic environment with sensitive local conditions and "network lag" in the chain of command. But in more static or settled market environments it may be wiser (for investors) to focus elsewhere and restrict founder autonomy. We see this pretty commonly with successful founders who get "phased out" and replaced with more experienced managers.
I wonder how much this sort of "distributed decision-making" has been formalized and studied.
Ozzie_osman|1 month ago
This was eye-opening. I used to think militaries were completely centralized and top-down, but a friend who was an officer explained this to me and pointed me to the literature. It was fascinating and educating to understand the principles behind Mission Command being successful as a method (competence, mutual trust, shared understanding, etc).
chinathrow|1 month ago
Not sure this was followed very recently.
Hendrikto|1 month ago
It is my understanding that the Russians do it that way, which does not seem to work out great for them.
aussieguy1234|1 month ago
notpushkin|1 month ago
baxtr|1 month ago
Grosvenor|1 month ago
kjkjadksj|1 month ago
2OEH8eoCRo0|1 month ago
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Five_paragraph_order
vasco|1 month ago
> In war the first principle is to disobey orders. Any fool can obey an order. He ought to have gone on, had he the slightest Nelsonic temperament in him.