[schnebbau]

What would happen if someone used photoshop to create CSAM? Should Adobe be held responsible because they didn't prevent it?

Grok is just another tool, and IMO it shouldn't have guard rails. The user is responsible for their prompts and what they create with it.

[jeffwask]

Someone spending 40 hours drawing a nude is not equivalent to someone saying take this photo and make them naked and having a naked photo in 4 seconds.

Only one of these is easily preventable with guardrails.

[theLegionWithin]

bet I can guess which of those two is more profitable

[ryandrake]

Is Grok simply a tool, or is it itself an agent of the creative process? If I told an art intern to create CSAM, he does, and then I publish it, who's culpable? Me? The intern? Both of us? I don't expect you to answer the question--it's not going to be a simple answer, and it's probably going to involve the courts very soon.

[schnebbau]

It's a tool. It isn't human, and (currently) is not intelligent. It's a conversational UI on top of a software program.

[roywiggins]

"if I hired a hitman to kill someone, he does, who's culpable? Me? The hitman? Both?"

It's both. Very simple. You can't get around liability by forming a conspiracy [0].

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Criminal_conspiracy

[mikeocool]

Don't know about CSAM, but photoshop won't open an image that shows more than 25% of a dollar bill to prevent counterfeiting.

[MallocVoidstar]

> Grok is just another tool, and IMO it shouldn't have guard rails.

How is the world improved by an AI tool that will generate sexual deepfake images of children?