Reasonable discussion is preceding your comment. Discouraging discourse around factual, legal information is how we arrived here. Your reflex to question its relevance as a means to reduce discovery, with or without agenda, is why it is relevant.
I think it's interesting that political discussion is removed because it's off topic, then when it's topical, it's "too far gone to have rational discussion". Disappointing.
> Discouraging discourse around factual, legal information is how we arrived here
> Your reflex to question its relevance
That's a lot of projecting.
There is only really one thing to be said here: the Pentagon and the current administration continues its campaign of blatant corruption, scorning its enemies with absurd doublespeak and blatant abuse of the court system, enabled by a Congress which has fully abdicated its duty as part of its loyalty to the current President King.
What is there to talk about? How we wish that was different? How the media being captured by oligarchs is a main enabler of the current oligarchy? How what Mark Kelly said was clearly not sedition and that use of this term is yet another example of "flooding the zone" and other disinformation tactics by the administration, to deflect from their own crime and rile up their base?
It's pretty clear the "kind of content" I'm referring to is the doublespeak that pervades American politics. And what is there to say about it? The comment section seems to pretty clearly align on "there is both no legal authority for this move and the action being punished is clearly not illegal", and yet we will all get to watch this slowly unravel however Trump wants, will we not?
steele|1 month ago
Supermancho|1 month ago
nawgz|1 month ago
> Your reflex to question its relevance
That's a lot of projecting.
There is only really one thing to be said here: the Pentagon and the current administration continues its campaign of blatant corruption, scorning its enemies with absurd doublespeak and blatant abuse of the court system, enabled by a Congress which has fully abdicated its duty as part of its loyalty to the current President King.
What is there to talk about? How we wish that was different? How the media being captured by oligarchs is a main enabler of the current oligarchy? How what Mark Kelly said was clearly not sedition and that use of this term is yet another example of "flooding the zone" and other disinformation tactics by the administration, to deflect from their own crime and rile up their base?
Great talk, haven't heard any of that before!
alterom|1 month ago
Factual reporting from a reputable news source.
That's "the kind of content" you're talking about.
I hope that it does belong on this website, because otherwise, it'd be little more than trashy blogspam.
Cheers.
nawgz|1 month ago