Yes, any zero-copy format in general will have this advantage because reading a value is essentially just a pointer dereference. Most of the message data can be completely ignored, so the CPU never needs to see it. Only the actual data accessed counts towards the limit.
Btw: in my project README I have benchmarks against Cap'N Proto & Google Flatbuffers.
eru|1 month ago
eliasdejong|1 month ago
One primary difference is that Rkyv does not support in-place mutation. So any modification of a message requires full reserialization, unlike Lite³.