Lots of weird marketing speak on here for an astronomical observatory. “Modular design that leverages economies of scale” what? These are telescopes, not telephones. There’s a very small amount of scientific grade ones in existence and they are all different.
> what? These are telescopes, not telephones. There’s a very small amount of scientific grade ones in existence and they are all different.
Have you not been following modern satellite and telescope bus architectures? Both planet and spacex have been using this model to great effect over the last decade.
Interesting. Wayne Rosing (Silicon Valley pioneer and early engineering lead at Google) has been working on a global telescope project for a long time now also.
The level of negativity in these comments is surprising. We can certainly debate whether billionaires should exist at all, but given that they do, here’s one who’s putting his money towards advancing cutting edge science instead of buying a third mega yacht. I am strongly in favor.
I agree with you. I clicked into this hoping to hear what new things we could learn or discover with the new observatories. Commenting on the more positive and informative side would be a better use of time and energy I think :)
The broader availability of data from astronomical observations starts to become relevant in the present time of coding agents that can help hobbyists.
From the website:
“The Lazuli Space Observatory is a 3-meter–class space-based astronomical facility designed for rapid-response observations and precision astrophysics across optical and near-infrared wavelengths.”
And we wall should be happy he doesn’t want to put a swarm of micro telescopes into the sky to mimic his approach for the ground based telescopes.
The last thing astronomy needs is even more satellite constellations polluting the night sky.
But that's objectively not true unless you're just trolling or being sarcastic? The cost and reach of ground based systems still has a considerable amount of use, still have many projects of those types ongoing. There's been a ton of great work on things like adaptive optics and laser guides have been excellent breakthroughs in extending that reach.
WD-42|1 month ago
Best of luck to them anyway.
Edit: it looks like the Argus array at least is a project out of Chapel Hill. Better info here: https://argus.unc.edu/specifications
Schmidt probably helping fund it.
reportingsjr|1 month ago
Have you not been following modern satellite and telescope bus architectures? Both planet and spacex have been using this model to great effect over the last decade.
wittyusername|1 month ago
halfmatthalfcat|1 month ago
knorker|1 month ago
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/lifestyle/article-13439603/eric-...
DetectDefect|1 month ago
benburleson|1 month ago
https://lco.global/
WD-42|1 month ago
tectonic|1 month ago
jacquesm|1 month ago
And one yacht should be enough, especially if it is like this:
https://luxurylaunches.com/transport/eric-schmidt-and-his-wi...
ojo-rojo|1 month ago
omoikane|1 month ago
Maybe not so surprising:
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46512881 "65% of Hacker News posts have negative sentiment, and they outperform" (2026-01-06, 456 comments)
xqcgrek2|1 month ago
pama|1 month ago
closewith|1 month ago
motoxpro|1 month ago
amelius|1 month ago
84729839278392|1 month ago
[deleted]
black_13|1 month ago
[deleted]
oulipo2|1 month ago
[deleted]
everfrustrated|1 month ago
[deleted]
defrost|1 month ago
Still, I'm suprised to hear from you that the Lazuli Space Observatory will apparently operate from ground level.
niemandhier|1 month ago
And we wall should be happy he doesn’t want to put a swarm of micro telescopes into the sky to mimic his approach for the ground based telescopes.
The last thing astronomy needs is even more satellite constellations polluting the night sky.
terminalbraid|1 month ago