top | item 46528350 (no title) bmenrigh | 1 month ago I'm happy this is public domain. In 2023 I used the stain images as the basis for a CTF challenge (for BSidesSF). The encoded flag given to participants was https://github.com/BSidesSF/ctf-2023-release/blob/main/alien...Unfortunately the challenge was a bit too hard and went unsolved during the competition. discuss order hn newest hughw|1 month ago It's hard to imagine a reason for it being kept... proprietary? bmenrigh|1 month ago A lot of people want to slap licenses on things without really thinking about what the license will do (or prevent), in practice.I like the author's note about the license: "As we do not believe in imaginary property, this package belongs to the public domain."I think it's much more common to see a Creative Commons license on this sort of thing. load replies (1)
hughw|1 month ago It's hard to imagine a reason for it being kept... proprietary? bmenrigh|1 month ago A lot of people want to slap licenses on things without really thinking about what the license will do (or prevent), in practice.I like the author's note about the license: "As we do not believe in imaginary property, this package belongs to the public domain."I think it's much more common to see a Creative Commons license on this sort of thing. load replies (1)
bmenrigh|1 month ago A lot of people want to slap licenses on things without really thinking about what the license will do (or prevent), in practice.I like the author's note about the license: "As we do not believe in imaginary property, this package belongs to the public domain."I think it's much more common to see a Creative Commons license on this sort of thing. load replies (1)
hughw|1 month ago
bmenrigh|1 month ago
I like the author's note about the license: "As we do not believe in imaginary property, this package belongs to the public domain."
I think it's much more common to see a Creative Commons license on this sort of thing.