[warmedcookie]

If you want a bunch of tailwind class slop, then yes. Otherwise, A lot of context engineering is needed if you want it to write modular tailwind components properly for large projects where consistency is important.

[pests]

> Otherwise, A lot of context engineering is needed if you want

I am not seeing that. I have a few AI-assisted projects using tailwind and scrolling through it now 99% of it looks... completely modern and professional. I had previously asked it to "completely refactor, a rewrite if needed, all the tailwind/css/app styles. ensure visual and code consistency across pages".

Modern coding tools add tons of their own content, but none of the above was "a lot of context engineering".

[satvikpendem]

> completely modern and professional

And it looks completely the same, so much so that people can tell it's AI generated now simply due to the gradient, among other design choices LLMs seem to make by default: https://prg.sh/ramblings/Why-Your-AI-Keeps-Building-the-Same...

[pmdr]

Absolutely, but the AI era seems to have lowered the bar for what's considered passable code. Slop works for most projects.

[dinkleberg]

And design too. I shouldn’t be able to tell Claude designed your site/app, but it is too often the case. Good taste still remains an advantage thankfully.