[skeuomorphism]

>As I am fond of saying, he’s always “a day late and a dollar short” by ‘exposing’ scams after they have already run their course or ‘rug pulled’

So.. the author wants him to tell us before it happens, and be right?

There was one going on with MrBeast and some crypto, and there was one of Paul brothers and his scam game that he predicted correctly before it went south?

Should he stop explaining these scams after they happen, too? Why is that such an issue?