It's a poor video, taken from far away at a high angle, one that misses the wide angle and intial context.
That video doesn't show the officer that shot, that you say was hit, reaching for and unholstering his weapon as she was reversing and then stepping into the turn cicle in front of the car to fire at her.
If he got hit then it was as a result of placing himself there in order to shoot the driver.
Did we watch the same video? That officer intentionally put himself infront of the car, was NOT hit by it, and shot the woman after he was clear from the danger and the car was pointed away from him.
The bodycam has been released, he was clearly hit by the car. The police had the car surrounded and were trying to make an arrest. She decided to escape through his body. https://x.com/nicksortor/status/2009683575298211979
> Well, i saw the video of her hitting the cop with her car
No, you didn't. And the fact that you're consistently lying about the sequence of events in said video does not help your case. Again, what do you get from lying about this?
defrost|1 month ago
That video doesn't show the officer that shot, that you say was hit, reaching for and unholstering his weapon as she was reversing and then stepping into the turn cicle in front of the car to fire at her.
If he got hit then it was as a result of placing himself there in order to shoot the driver.
Legally, this is clear unjustified use of force.
actionfromafar|1 month ago
unknown|1 month ago
[deleted]
Helloworldboy|1 month ago
[deleted]
glhaynes|1 month ago
Hey, any thoughts on this short NYT video analysis?
superb_dev|1 month ago
LightHugger|1 month ago
fzeroracer|1 month ago
No, you didn't. And the fact that you're consistently lying about the sequence of events in said video does not help your case. Again, what do you get from lying about this?
LightHugger|1 month ago
[deleted]