top | item 46539375 (no title) quaintdev | 1 month ago Yeah I know how that sounds but it's the most logical explanation. discuss order hn newest philipwhiuk|1 month ago Alternatively, they don't have a viable business model?This isn't rocket science. If your business can't exist within the law, it doesn't get to exist. wiseowise|1 month ago There’s no law that says you have to pay businesses because you make customers life easier.If ChatGPT answers a law question for you that you’d have to ask an expensive lawyer, are they supposed to pay the lawyer too? taormina|1 month ago Tell Uber you said hi.
philipwhiuk|1 month ago Alternatively, they don't have a viable business model?This isn't rocket science. If your business can't exist within the law, it doesn't get to exist. wiseowise|1 month ago There’s no law that says you have to pay businesses because you make customers life easier.If ChatGPT answers a law question for you that you’d have to ask an expensive lawyer, are they supposed to pay the lawyer too? taormina|1 month ago Tell Uber you said hi.
wiseowise|1 month ago There’s no law that says you have to pay businesses because you make customers life easier.If ChatGPT answers a law question for you that you’d have to ask an expensive lawyer, are they supposed to pay the lawyer too?
philipwhiuk|1 month ago
This isn't rocket science. If your business can't exist within the law, it doesn't get to exist.
wiseowise|1 month ago
If ChatGPT answers a law question for you that you’d have to ask an expensive lawyer, are they supposed to pay the lawyer too?
taormina|1 month ago