[utternerd]

That article cites nothing other than someone's model. There is no hard evidence in what you linked.

[ikrenji]

Someone's model says that if you detonate a nuclear bomb in Manhattan, millions will die. There is no hard evidence tho.

[wilg]

You can read more here: https://www.oxfamamerica.org/explore/issues/making-foreign-a...

[nemo]

While the quantification isn't inherently reliable, the reality of many dead at the hands at Elon Mush is a simple fact that's not up for dispute. The only question is how many he's killed so far. He cut off life saving meds to sick kids and food aid to the areas with food shortages, the deaths are known and reliably reported.

[utternerd]

Then it should be easy to prove, instead of saying "it isn't up for dispute" or citing a person's model.

[trimethylpurine]

Technically his department produced and advised on the data. It's just a government BI team. This is like blaming the BI team for the CEO's decision to fire people. Part of the process, sure. But this a decision made by the majority of Congress. Let's not forget who the bad guy is.

[suburban_strike]

> a simple fact that's not up for dispute

We used to say the same about the male/female binary.

> He cut off life saving meds

Sophistry. Forcing charity is literal enslavement. Withholding charity is not homicide.