[danso]

You condition your take with “I’m not talking about deepfakes of real people”, but why do you think it is that Grok offers users the ability to generate pornographic imagery of entirely fake digital people — even tailoring them to be as visually flawless as one could desire — and yet so many users end up using it to generate deepfake porn of real people?

So with that in mind, why should we assume that the unrestricted proliferation of fake child porn would not produce significant harm downstream to society? Is the assumption that unlimited fake child porn would satiate the kind of people who now seek out real child porn?