[ddoolin]

> Yes I can. I even provided an example for exactly that: `[4]any` can hold references to any type.

And now you've lost type checking. `(&'static str, bool, u64, f64)` is not the same as `[4]any`.

> A lot of things are useful, doesn't mean they are used for that useful case most of the time.

I'm sure you have vast insights into what most people do most of the time.

> Go has wrapped and typed errors, covering exactly that.

Sure, "Go has X because it gives you the tools to reimplement it yourself another way" is true of most anything you can think of.