(no title)
baincs | 1 month ago
I think the opposite trend will also emerge and more than offset this. Yes, vibe coded tools may fit the needs of low-stake applications for some companies, but if it was low-stake enough to start with, they likely didn't hire many devs, if any. More likely we'll see non-tech companies starting to hire a dev to build custom software (e.g., ERP) suitable for their use cases vs. buying SaaS and paying consultants to customize it.
a4isms|1 month ago
Look at how much they are spending. Think about how HN cheered Tesla's innovation in disintermediating vehicle sales by selling direct. Now think about OpenAI or whomever selling directly to enterprises. It's the same proposition:
"That Enterprise SaaS startup adds a markup to the AI that is powering your app."
Again, this is only IF the AI-vangelists are correct that some startups will collapse to a solopreneur. I am not sure that those same startups won't vanish entirely.\
———
There are some high-stakes apps where Enterprises prefer vendors for extrinsic reasons. For example, some apps must have certain certifications, and in a vibe-coded future, the cost of certification could exceed the cost of development by multiple orders of magnitude. And it needs to be kept up. Another example would be apps where for liability reasons, it is helpful that there be an "industry standard."
But lots and lots and lots of apps are not nearly so consequential.
falloutx|1 month ago
francisofascii|1 month ago