Good, it's barbaric child abuse. No other form of permanent body modification surgery (especially to genitals!) would be allowed on infants who can't consent. An adult wants to get circumcised? Go for it. It's pretty wild that we allow it on babies that can't even speak.
dang|1 month ago
https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html
(Before somebody pounces with "so we're not allowed to post about $TOPIC now?": no, I'm not secretly advocating for circumcision (of all things) and this comment is not about $TOPIC. I just had to hang it somewhere so I chose the most recent thread.
The issue is the overall pattern of the account's behavior, which is clearly against HN's rules.)
soldthat|1 month ago
[deleted]
sporkxrocket|1 month ago
You happily let this account continue: https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=soldthat
FridayoLeary|1 month ago
[deleted]
wiether|1 month ago
And my question to you: what gives you the right to impose your worldview on someone elses *body* Just because you think it's better?
Fire-Dragon-DoL|1 month ago
fooqux|1 month ago
Babies don't have a religion.
9x39|1 month ago
Who have no way to know whether they would prefer to not have it done.
It’s not FGM, but it’s in the realm of it relative to reduced sensory ability.
kyleee|1 month ago
sporkxrocket|1 month ago