[hoppp]

The difference is that they are reselling it directly. They charge for inference that outputs tailwind.

It's fine to have a project that generates html-css as long as the users can find the docs for the dependencies, but when you take away the docs and stop giving real credit to the creators it starts feeling more like plagiarism and that is what's costing tailwind here.

[what]

Wouldn’t that mean any freelancer that uses tail wind is reselling it?

[hoppp]

The freelancer does navigate to the documentation page and might propose the client to buy the templates to speed up work.

Thats a big difference. Freelancers using it can bring compounding value as they can sell templates to every client

AI using it bring no value as the AI won't recommend buying the templates