[Dinux]

I'd expect even more chaos, let an LLM build the features and people vote.

[stavros]

Behold: https://theboard.stavros.io/

[Lerc]

I kind-of want to see an experiment going the other way.

Have a repo that has a committee of AI models deciding what to merge. Inform them of the goals of the project and that they should only allow positive changes but people are allowed to make adversarial PRs.

It can be more active because the committee can meet on demand. Then people and AI's can attempt to bend the project to their wills.

[oniony]

I honestly thought that this is what it was initially.

[deadbabe]

Is most code not written by LLMs these days anyway?

[Kinrany]

Most code by lines, perhaps, but not most code that works and is useful