(no title)
bionade24 | 1 month ago
No, Archlinux was repeatedly behind with package updates. This even went as far as lagging behind Ubuntu in at least one instance, causing inconvenience and frustration for users which then either had to use other more up-to-date sources for dependencies or package the newer version of dependencies under a different installroot themselves.
This problem is caused by a staff shortage or the average necessary maintanance effort for repo packages. At least one of those 2 causes has to be solved.
guerrilla|1 month ago
It does it's job. I've been using it on the desktop for decades now with never needing to care about anything like that. If it ain't broke, don't fix it...
1una|1 month ago
Maybe Python: https://old.reddit.com/r/archlinux/comments/1azkxnn/whats_ho...
HendrikHensen|1 month ago
nineteen999|1 month ago
That is why projects like Arch ... Nixos ... etc ... all eventually become "niche".
homebrewer|1 month ago
It might be the 20th package manager in existence, which would be a problem, if Debian maintainers did not release a 20th way to build .debs just a year or two ago, mostly (but not really) deprecating the previous 19 ways. No thanks.
mqus|1 month ago
I'm the same as the sibling commenter, I don't want to have another deb or rpm distro. The AUR wouldn't exist without pacman&makepkg.