top | item 46576056 (no title) dbcpp | 1 month ago I would argue performance-noexcept-move-constructor should always be on. Move constructors should almost always be noexcept since they typically just move pointers around and don't do allocations normally. discuss order hn newest unknown|1 month ago [deleted] jcelerier|1 month ago eh, depends. for instance think about a small_vector or small_string dbcpp|1 month ago True, in that case it should just adopt the noexcept status of the object it holds.
jcelerier|1 month ago eh, depends. for instance think about a small_vector or small_string dbcpp|1 month ago True, in that case it should just adopt the noexcept status of the object it holds.
dbcpp|1 month ago True, in that case it should just adopt the noexcept status of the object it holds.
unknown|1 month ago
[deleted]
jcelerier|1 month ago
dbcpp|1 month ago