[rajivjain]

My biggest peeve with macOS Tahoe is the App Launcher redesign.

It seems like a clear regression in usability. By moving from a high-density, full-screen experience to a constrained, scrolling window, they’ve increased the interaction cost for launching apps via the mouse. It feels like a 'unification tax. Sacrificing desktop utility to align with non-Desktop modalilties. Does anyone see a functional upside here, or is this purely aesthetic consistency?

[VerifiedReports]

The removal of Launchpad was an inexplicable blunder. The OS now provides no way to organize your applications.

Why would I want my dev tools, audio apps, 3-D-modeling apps, and office apps all jumbled together?

It's as if Apple is trying to catch up to Microsoft in the race to regress.

[EagnaIonat]

> The removal of Launchpad was an inexplicable blunder.

It wasn't a blunder. It was absolutely intentional to force users to start using the AI component.

I suspect someone probably pointed out no one would use it because launchpad has a better UX, so they removed it and forced the three finger pinch to launch spotlight.

I'm currently using the following to fix it.

- Bug in preferences that disabling show home also disables 3 finger pinch.

- I'm using AppGrid as my new launchpad.

- Using better touch tool to activate launchpad with 3 finger pinch.

[halapro]

They want you to search. I probably have 200 apps on my phone and their automatic categorization is good enough for me. Most common ones I just search anyway.

[egypturnash]

You can still make subdirectories in /Applications.

[dajt]

I was shocked when I first hit this. I'm also confused as to why the settings app constrains the window size but I think it did that in the previous version too - not a justification!

I complained about it to a team mate and he thought it was fine and I was weird for using the app launcher and not cmd-space. Although on Windows I always use win-r to run stuff.

Tahoe UI changes and LG are such a mistake and Apple being Apple will probably just double down on it.

[vehemenz]

This is a weird one. I think their reasoning was that most people don't use Launchpad, so they integrated it into Spotlight to eliminate redundancy.

I much prefer the new app launcher in Tahoe, but it was created at the expense of Launchpad, which some people actually relied on. I don't know why they couldn't have kept both options.

[data-ottawa]

I don't know why it's so laggy when you open it. First time you open and scroll it jitters and not all app icons are loaded, so they kind of chunk and overlap.

You get worse icon pop-in if you add your app folder with grid view to the dock. These aren't stored on the network, so it's baffling they take so long to load the icons.

[concinds]

> It feels like a 'unification tax. Sacrificing desktop utility to align with non-Desktop modalilties

No. Launchpad is just the iOS springboard brought to Mac, with big icons and folders and pages. When it was added people complained of "iOS-ification".

This time they made a proper, unique Mac equivalent, integrated in Spotlight and built around the keyboard. It's not as good, the window was too small in 26.0, doesn't support uninstallation like Launchpad, but it's definitely less iOS-like.

[rick_dalton]

I think you have it backwards. The new app launcher is unequivocally more like iOS. Like iOS' app launcher it: 1. does not support making your own folders which launchpad had 2. has groups per app type like "Creativity" or "Productivity" which are literally taken verbatim from the iOS app drawer/launcher page. Both designs are obviously inspired by iOS but I don't see it as a mac optimized version at all.

[deafpolygon]

It’s consistency with the rest of Spotlight. I imagine they want to enhance it, but getting people to use it might be the first step.

[zapzupnz]

Maybe they didn't want people seeing their awful new icons at large enough sizes that the seams would be showing...

[Ringz]

Yep. I hate it. Its easier to open the Finder and use the shortcut to open the application folder.