[fuzzythinker]

It wasn't ill timed. Any sane leader would understand both size and cost of tech always comes down rather quickly over time. He's just refused to accept having lidar uglify his cars or wait for it to get smaller. He instead fabricates about humans don't have lidars so cars shouldn't have them and sold "no lidars on Teslas" as an advantage instead of the opposite and refuses to accept the truth due to needing to feed his ego. Firing all non-yesmen didn't help either.

[ndsipa_pomu]

That always struck me as a weak argument. Humans don't have wheels, so maybe he should have designed cars without wheels too.

[schiffern]

That strikes me as a weak argument. We have vehicles with legs, but wheels are just better, practically speaking.

The argument is that humans provide a proof-of-concept that vision + neural net can drive a car, because (for some reason) some people doubt this is possible. However there's no need for a "proof of concept" that mechanical legs can be built, because everyone already know that building mechanical legs is possible.