top | item 46593391 (no title) shihab | 1 month ago For SIMD at least, the {mins[3], maxs[3]} representation aligns more naturally with actual instructions on x86. To compute a new bounding box:new_box.mins = _mm_min_ps(a.mins[3], b.mins[3]); discuss order hn newest astrange|1 month ago You would want [4] not [3], with the last one being padding. Of course, you can't always afford that. delta_p_delta_x|1 month ago Indeed. This is classic array-of-structs versus struct-of-arrays.
astrange|1 month ago You would want [4] not [3], with the last one being padding. Of course, you can't always afford that.
astrange|1 month ago
delta_p_delta_x|1 month ago