[materialpoint]

Well, we sorely need something better than the current static code analysis tools, like sub-par products SonarQube and CodeQL that see massive overuse, because these tools do not understand that living and evolving code needs imperfections and that _most_ programmers have already thought through their code and made decisions that can't align with poor text book examples of "correct code".

[err0r500]

I totally agree, and even if the results here can’t be perfect I developed the approach more by the way dev is approached in different context (I never really realized it before reading Simon Wardley book)