top | item 46603300 (no title) Cuuugi | 1 month ago The implication is that you are attacking the defenseless. There is none more defenseless than the dead. discuss order hn newest mcdonje|1 month ago Not true.1. Plenty of living people defend the reputations of dead people.2. There's no proof that anything we say or do has any impact on dead people. card_zero|1 month ago Well, if you think of person as a bunch of ideas, maybe with a mind attached, then by attacking a dead person you're attacking a bunch of vulnerable ideas that no longer have a mind to defend them. You can still call it a person, if you like. load replies (1) fogus|1 month ago No one cares less about defending themselves being attacked than the dead. card_zero|1 month ago No one is less tolerant of attacks than the dead. soco|1 month ago Godwin's law approaching
mcdonje|1 month ago Not true.1. Plenty of living people defend the reputations of dead people.2. There's no proof that anything we say or do has any impact on dead people. card_zero|1 month ago Well, if you think of person as a bunch of ideas, maybe with a mind attached, then by attacking a dead person you're attacking a bunch of vulnerable ideas that no longer have a mind to defend them. You can still call it a person, if you like. load replies (1)
card_zero|1 month ago Well, if you think of person as a bunch of ideas, maybe with a mind attached, then by attacking a dead person you're attacking a bunch of vulnerable ideas that no longer have a mind to defend them. You can still call it a person, if you like. load replies (1)
fogus|1 month ago No one cares less about defending themselves being attacked than the dead. card_zero|1 month ago No one is less tolerant of attacks than the dead.
mcdonje|1 month ago
1. Plenty of living people defend the reputations of dead people.
2. There's no proof that anything we say or do has any impact on dead people.
card_zero|1 month ago
fogus|1 month ago
card_zero|1 month ago
soco|1 month ago