[aardvarkr]

No, you can think of them more like unarmed artillery shells. Can you walk down the street to buy some artillery munitions?

Even if they were considered arms for the purpose of 2a this isn’t a ban on drones but a specific manufacturer. They government can definitely refuse to grant a manufacturer license to sell on this country.

[542354234235]

After Mcviegh, shouldn’t all U-Haul’s be seen as unarmed vehicular large IEDs? A drone isn’t like an artillery shell because an artillery shell is for putting in an artillery gun. A drone is for flying. Just because something can be modified to serve as some sort of weapon, does make it basically a weapon.

[mothballed]

It was quite common in the wake of McVeigh and other large vehicle attacks that they should be seen as weapons and licensing strengthened.

The fact you can drive a 26,000 lb GVWR truck without any special license is something special we have in America compared to most of say, Europe. It's actually pretty mind blowing anyone can just rent 26 ft diesel 26,000 lb truck and get in and drive it on the highway.

It is testament to the fact there are a few vestiges of freedom left in America. Not much, but a few vestiges, since such trucks were around before the regulation hysteria of the late 20th century and 21st century.

[skeeter2020]

>> Can you walk down the street to buy some artillery munitions?

No I need to go to a flea market for that.

It's not a specific manufacturer; it will impact US-made drones too, and based on how it's being rolled out is intended to shut down decent quality, inexpensive and easily-acquired drown sales - exactly what say, a journalist might want.

[toast0]

Pretty sure you can find inert artillery shells for sale if you cjeck your thrift and military surplus store.

[Ancapistani]

> Can you walk down the street to buy some artillery munitions?

No, but you can walk down the street and buy all the components.

To buy the shells, there’s a $200 tax (each!) and a form you have to fill out.

[mothballed]

Not really, not for the air warfare context of drones.

SAM can't be bought for any tax and they come with lifetime in jail if you have them, even just for peaceful purposes.[]

Giving up air military supremacy isn't something the USA is going to yield to its citizens. The tax is reflective of the fact that machineguns and destructive devices can't be banned as they are "arms" that can merely be taxed, but the US doesn't considered air warfare weapons generally to be bearable arms.

As drones become a dominating form of air superiority I would expect they start to become more like SAMs -- not bearable arms but rather arms that merely having in your arms mean you go in a cage forever even if you have an NFA stamp affixed.

https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/2332g