[Phemist]

He was already quite vocally pro-Trump during the primaries and 2016 presidential run.

[machomaster]

He wasn't though. He was simply analyzing the communication styöe of Trump, using his hypnosis knowledge, and explained why and how it was better (more efficient) than the competitors. This turned out to be true, giving him the win, just like Scott Adams predicted.

The description of reality is not at all the same as supporting it. "Is" vs. "Ought to be".

[omnibrain]

His explanation why he endorsed Hillary Clinton was pretty lunatic though.