[unshavedyak]

Yup, that's what my team does. It works wonderfully, and it fits well with Github's "large PR" mindset imo. It could be a bit better in the Github UI, but so can most things. I vastly prefer it to individually reviewing tons of PRs.

The funny thing about this debate for me is that i find it comes down to the committer. If the committer makes small commits in a stacked PR, where each commit is a logical unit of work, part of the "story" being told about the overall change, then i don't personally find it's that useful to stack them. The committer did the hard part, they wrote the story of changes in a logical, easy to parse manner.

If the story is a mess, where the commits are huge or out of logical order, etc - then it doesn't matter much in my view.. the PR(s) sucks either way.

I find stacked PRs to be a workflow solution to what to me is a UI problem.