[sanity]

You’re treating disagreement as evidence of moral failure, then using that to retroactively justify the label. That’s not reasoning — it’s tribal sorting. You must exist in quite a bubble, a rapidly shrinking one.

[amrocha]

You have the causality backwards. Your moral stance is abhorrent, therefore I disagree with you and want nothing to do with you. Not the other way around.

[sanity]

My moral stance is abhorrent to about 7% of the population who the other 93% want nothing to do with.

I'll get over it.

[Capricorn2481]

You can't dismiss other people's assessment of your politics just because they are different from yours. That makes no sense.