[BoxOfRain]

I think the following things can both be true at the same time:

* LLMs are a useful tool in a variety of circumstances.

* Sam Altman is personally incentivised to spout a great deal of hyped-up rubbish about both what LLMs are capable of, and can be capable of.

[runarberg]

These are not independent hypotheses. If (b) is true it decreases the possibility that (a) is true and vice versa.

The dependency here is that if Sam Altman is indeed a con man, it is reasonable to assume that he has in fact conned many people who then report an over inflated metric on the usefulness of the stuff they just bought (people don’t like to believe they were conned; cognitive dissonance).

In other words, if Sam Altman is indeed a con man, it is very likely that most metrics of the usefulness of his product is heavily biased.

[latexr]

Yes, that’s the point I’m making. In the scenario you’re describing, that would make Sam Altman a con man. Alternatively, he could simply be delusional and/or stupid. But given his history of deceit with Loopt and Worldcoin, there is precedent for the former.

[pousada]

It would make every marketing department and basically every startup founder conmen too. While I don’t completely disagree with that framing it’s not really helpful.