[xlii]

That's true, but acceptance is still all or nothing.

When chaining commits it's possible to (for example) have a function that does THING and then have another PR that have a function that uses first one.

It's somewhat PITA when team has no-dead-code hard rule, but otherwise it's quite manageable and invites rich feedback. Reviewer and feedback can focus on atomic change (in example: function that does THING) and not on a grand picture.

But I also often use method of logical PRs and even written about it: https://xlii.space/eng/pr_trick/