[chiefalchemist]

Low-quality is relative. LLMs' low-quality is most people's above-average. The fact the copy - either way - is likely to go through some sort of copy-by-committee process makes the case for LLMs even stronger (i.e., why waste your time). Not always, but quite often.

[LtWorf]

No it's not. It's low quality because it's extremely verbose and that wastes time.

[chiefalchemist]

That's a function of the prompt. The tool only performs as well as you're able to instruct it.