(no title)
Sean-Der | 1 month ago
* Cheaper servers. More competition and I want to see people running their own servers.
* Better video quality. Encoding from source is going to be better then transcoding.
* No more bad servers. Send video to your audience and server isn't able to do modification/surveillance with E2E Encryption via WebRTC.
* Better Latency. No more time lost transcoding. I love low latency streaming where people are connected to community. Not just blasting one-way video.
dwrodri|1 month ago
YouTube likely won't support streaming 3440x1440 60FPS video, and while discord technically supports it, they usually compress the footage fairly aggressively once it's sent up to the client, so I'd like to host my own; it only needs to support a few people. I wouldn't mind hosting it so my friends and side project partners can watch me code and play games in high quality.
Sean-Der|1 month ago
Then you can forward your lowest quality stream to YouTube with FFmpeg/GStreamer. Hopefully no re-encoding needed!
ca6d8815|1 month ago
Context here is just self-hosting my own site for friends to stream to friends (instead of whatever we squeeze out of Discord).
The WebRTC work sounds awesome, would like to try it out.
Sean-Der|1 month ago
You can try it out at https://b.siobud.com to see if you like it first. It if fits your needs then go for the self host :) I run my instance on Hetzner
I want to add more features to it, but I have been focused on OBS mostly lately. If you have any ideas/needs that would make it work for you and your friends I would love to hear! Join the discord and would love to chat.
What I want to do next is make a 're-broadcast feature'. So friends can stream to it + hang out. When they are ready they hit a button and then goes to Twitch/YouTube etc...
chownie|1 month ago
We ended up just doing a discord screen share, which evaded all the tunnelling/transcoding/etc issues which made us give up on WebRTC.
Sean-Der|1 month ago
Can you try Broadcast Box. If that is still too heavy, what could I do to make it better?
RobotToaster|1 month ago
Sean-Der|1 month ago
If you want more control over your video quality/capture it's nice to not have to use your browser. Trade off is its way harder to setup.
gsala|1 month ago
Sean-Der|1 month ago
I think the best way to do it today is via a Browser Source. It is hard to get people excited because it is already technically possible.
I will keep working on that PR!