[etyp]

To quote the very first paragraph of the bytecode interpreter section[1]:

> The style of interpretation it uses—walking the AST directly—is good enough for some real-world uses, but leaves a lot to be desired for a general-purpose scripting language.

Sometimes it's useful to teach progressively, using techniques that were used more often and aren't as much anymore, rather than firehosing a low-level bytecode at people.

[1] https://craftinginterpreters.com/a-bytecode-virtual-machine....

[HarHarVeryFunny]

Sure, I'm not criticizing it.

He's doesn't actually build on this though, but rather goes back to a single pass compiler (no AST, no visitor) for his bytecode compiler.