I’d be interested to see a satirical concept like this that goes more in depth by, say, having the operational semantics help fuel the satire. When I see things like this, I always feel underwhelmed when it’s just a keyword swap.
For example, take the title. Imagine if the PL was a declarative way of describing a distributed system, with HTTP endpoints or web sockets connecting modules. Then, for harvesting, it gives unbounded ability for nodes to read and write to other nodes outside of the standard interface. You can just go in and read/write their data, without any public interface needed. Of course someone else can probably come up with something better, but I think it’d be cool to see something that more fully uses what a “programming language” means.
I don't think I've seen satire in the form of a programming language before :). Neat. Does anyone else have any other examples? All I can think of are languages like Velado (uses notes) and Piet.
I mean theoretically brainf*ck is, but I'm pretty if you were to find satirical programming languages they would be satirizing development itself or a type of development (object-oriented, functional), and this is satirizing a purpose of development.
I still don’t really get the point. If the joke works without being a programming language, why make it one? We already have plenty of real languages people don’t want to learn or maintain — adding a satirical one feels more like a novelty than a statement.
Flagged: code and prose written by an LLM, and uncanny-valley as a result - a few examples:
- the programming language part is dropped almost immediately by the LLM.
- The unrelated meat emojis to give it an animated background
- Painfully generic / not attempting to make a joke: "This language finally lets me express my true feelings about variable assignment."
- Every section has exactly the "right" length, ~3-5 items per list, ~2-3 paragraphs per section.
Hate to eat downvotes for saying this, I hate what FB / Zuck too and understand the impulse to treat it as unneeded negativity.
However, I've been on HN for 16 years, and can't remember a time I've seen a human-generated surface-level satire persist in the top posts. Seems to me the length and subject let the slop skate, at least so far.
should probably have id="section" too, then you don't need to do all that hard work remembering if you should write section, #section, or .section in your code
Yeah actually, I wanted to demonstrate claude code, and my relatively complicated process for developement to someone, so I made a programming language to show them.
I actually met mark when we were both mentoring the fwd.us hackathon, from that limited interaction, I do think hed probably get a reasonable chuckle out of this.
chrisnight|1 month ago
For example, take the title. Imagine if the PL was a declarative way of describing a distributed system, with HTTP endpoints or web sockets connecting modules. Then, for harvesting, it gives unbounded ability for nodes to read and write to other nodes outside of the standard interface. You can just go in and read/write their data, without any public interface needed. Of course someone else can probably come up with something better, but I think it’d be cool to see something that more fully uses what a “programming language” means.
jayzalowitz|1 month ago
halperter|1 month ago
forgotpwd16|1 month ago
pnut|1 month ago
everydayZombie|1 month ago
aboveandbeyond|1 month ago
tyre|1 month ago
I love this.
Gabrys1|1 month ago
dleslie|1 month ago
https://github.com/samshadwell/TrumpScript
bryanrasmussen|1 month ago
alex1138|1 month ago
(It's not enough to copy Snapchat - probably severely financially hurting them, by stealing their Prior Art - you have to do things like https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2019/09/snapchat-reporte... as well, and just remember: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=1692122)
maomaomiumiu|1 month ago
jayzalowitz|1 month ago
This was made by claude code as a demo to someone, and because I thought it would be funny.
It actually works have a look: https://github.com/jayzalowitz/zucksharp
refulgentis|1 month ago
- the programming language part is dropped almost immediately by the LLM.
- The unrelated meat emojis to give it an animated background
- Painfully generic / not attempting to make a joke: "This language finally lets me express my true feelings about variable assignment."
- Every section has exactly the "right" length, ~3-5 items per list, ~2-3 paragraphs per section.
Hate to eat downvotes for saying this, I hate what FB / Zuck too and understand the impulse to treat it as unneeded negativity.
However, I've been on HN for 16 years, and can't remember a time I've seen a human-generated surface-level satire persist in the top posts. Seems to me the length and subject let the slop skate, at least so far.
StilesCrisis|1 month ago
xerox13ster|1 month ago
The meat emojis are relevant
timeon|1 month ago
refulgentis|1 month ago
IncreasePosts|1 month ago
forgotpwd16|1 month ago
psnehanshu|1 month ago
unknown|1 month ago
[deleted]
hulitu|1 month ago
... any other version will break it. RIP SW engineering.
I guess this has become a mantra: "Going forward is a way to retreat. " TTOP
unknown|1 month ago
[deleted]
luqmansen|1 month ago
[deleted]
jkhall81|1 month ago
jayzalowitz|1 month ago
Yeah actually, I wanted to demonstrate claude code, and my relatively complicated process for developement to someone, so I made a programming language to show them.
I actually met mark when we were both mentoring the fwd.us hackathon, from that limited interaction, I do think hed probably get a reasonable chuckle out of this.
TehCorwiz|1 month ago
footy|1 month ago
etchalon|1 month ago
strathmeyer|1 month ago
[deleted]