top | item 46641284

List of individual trees

368 points| wilson090 | 1 month ago |en.wikipedia.org

116 comments

order

smu3l|1 month ago

A couple of decades ago I was taking a class at UNC on survey sampling methods. Topics included designing sampling schemes that were efficient in the statistical and actual cost sense, developing variance estimators based on your sampling scheme, etc.

For example if you want to observe and measure some attribute of classes at public schools in your county, it might be infeasible to send data collectors to all of 15 schools, but the marginal cost of measuring additional classrooms at the same school once you're there is minimal. So, how many schools should you visit and how many class rooms per school given a budget and assumptions on inter and intra school variation?

We had had a group assignment to estimate the average circumference of trees on campus. Our initial plan something like 1) get a map of campus and split it into zones 2) sample zones randomly 3) everyone goes to a few (small) zones and tries to roughly map out the trees there 4) sample again from those trees and physically measure them. This would mean running around campus for at least a few days if we wanted to an honest job. And it was a rainy spring in North Carolina.

However, one of my group mates had a stroke of brilliance and decided to email the grounds department. To our surprise they were able to provide us with a full list of every known tree on campus as well as GIS data with locations. So we were able to do a legitimate simple random sample which was optimally efficient from in terms of both variance and time-in-rain.

In conclusion I'm pro list-of-individual-trees.

OisinMoran|1 month ago

Delighted to see my local one in there, with a description reading like it was written by Douglas Adams.

“The Hungry Tree is an otherwise unremarkable specimen of the London plane, which has become known for having partially consumed a nearby park bench.”

hoten|1 month ago

> with a description reading like it was written by Douglas Adams.

No kidding! From the wikipedia page:

> Consideration was given to listing the bench as a protected structure but was decided against as there could then have been a requirement imposed on the council to destroy the tree to protect the bench

dcre|1 month ago

Growing up I would see authors listing particular species of trees when describing a scene, and I’d marvel at the idea of someone getting all the references. It seemed so old-timey. But during the pandemic, my wife and I got into plants because it was an outdoor activity. I used an app to identify all the trees in our neighborhood (then we found out our town has a map online of them all). I have my favorite ones I like to go by on walks. In a given area there are really only 10 or 15 species you have to know to cover most of the trees you see. Being aware of these things adds depth to the world as you experience it.

kelseyfrog|1 month ago

cbdevidal|1 month ago

My dumb butt thought it was gonna be a list of every tree in the world, all eight gazillion of them

autoexec|1 month ago

I'm surprised that the Katamari games include a longer list of physical objects than wikipedia.

croisillon|1 month ago

The list of animals has dolphins and birds but not humans?

NoSalt|1 month ago

So sad that the Sycamore Gap Tree is listed as "historical" because of those two idiots. I'm glad they're in jail.

Also, why isn't the Whomping Willow in there somewhere? They should create a new sub-category for "Fictional" trees.

mordechai9000|1 month ago

I picked three North American trees arbitrarily, and they were all cut down, one by vandals, one by a protester who sounds a bit crazy, and one by a researcher.

rhplus|1 month ago

Humans, man.

The Tree of Ténéré was a solitary acacia that was once considered the most isolated tree on Earth. It was a landmark on caravan routes through the Ténéré region of the Sahara Desert in northeast Niger, so well known that it and the Lost Tree to the north are the only trees to be shown on a map at a scale of 1:4,000,000. The tree is estimated to have existed for approximately 300 years until it was knocked down in 1973 by a drunk truck driver.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tree_of_T%C3%A9n%C3%A9r%C3%A9

jihadjihad|1 month ago

And then there's the Senator Tree [0], estimated to be more than ten times older (~3500 years), which was "killed when a meth addict started a garbage fire inside the hollow trunk so she could see the crystal meth she was trying to smoke."

0: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Senator_(tree)

orenlindsey|1 month ago

What I find funny is how the drunk driver was able to hit the only obstacle in sight in the middle of an empty desert.

hopelite|1 month ago

forget 300 year old trees... the Californians cut down sequoia trees that were probably up to 6000 years old. The oldest current one alive is estimated to be only 3200 years old.

On a scale of atrocities humans have committed, I can't really think of anything that is more atrocious than the felling of those sequoias that were at the very least as old as the oldest known human civilization. 6000+ years ... poof gone, turned into beams and furniture for houses. They've been around at least 100 Million years, but almost and possibly will not survive what is the equivalent of 0.173 seconds if you scale the 100M years to one day.

Among all the many atrocities humans have and currently are committing, things like destroying something that took 6000 years to grow seems particularly bad because there is no way to even really restore or save that, like you might be able to restore an at-risk population of animals or even revive an extinct species.

It takes about 150-200 years (we don't really know) for a sequoia to become mature, i.e., fruitful, and then it requires fire to reproduce. Let me repeat that, it absolutely requires fire to reproduce once it as matured following surviving around 175 years of human proximity, not sooner.

For our European community, it seems that the various redwoods and sequoia that were planted in Europe in the 19th century, could be coming into maturity now/soon. They are technically invasive, but at a 175 year maturity cycle, I suspect there's not much you have to worry about.

mkl|1 month ago

cl3misch|1 month ago

While this is interesting and impressive, I kinda relate more to OP's link of more "normal" trees. Going through the list gives me a feeling how many cool trees there are all over the place.

bhasi|1 month ago

I've been to the Ancient Bristlecone Pine forest in Inyo County, CA where the Methuselah tree lives. Though I didn't get to see that specific tree because the sun was fast setting and I wasn't prepared to hike around in darkness, I had a pretty amazing experience being the presence of 4000- and 5000-year old trees.

esperent|1 month ago

> A tree located in an established gay cruising area, noted for its slender trunk which facilitates gay sex.

The mind boggles haha

I can't believe this got past the Wikipedia editors.

anotherblue|1 month ago

Wikipedia is not censored.

riffraff|1 month ago

I read that and assumed this must be some joke article and/or art stunt. After reading the article and linked sources, I'm still not sure that ain't true.

NicuCalcea|1 month ago

It's a pretty notorious tree in London, don't see a reason why it wouldn't be included.

globular-toast|1 month ago

I noticed the "bicycle tree" in Scotland which has encapsulated a bicycle amongst other things as it has grown. It reminded me of a very old graveyard I would play in as a kid. The oldest side was all old trees and one day I noticed one of the trees had a couple of gravestones up in its boughs. I always wondered if these were really lifted up there by the tree and if so whether that's unusual.

oasisbob|1 month ago

Trees don't grow in a manner which can typically lift things. It's really unusual - and requires either distinct circumstances, or highly technical measurements between gauge pins.

Those gravestones had help getting up there.

MeteorMarc|1 month ago

This moves me. It affirms that grown trees have tremendous personality.

divbzero|1 month ago

One of Wikipedia’s greatest contributions is collecting records like this that wouldn’t appear in a traditional encyclopedia.

fudgybiscuits|1 month ago

Yeah you can bet the Fuck Tree wouldn't make it into any encyclopedia.

FarmerPotato|1 month ago

I think the term for this is 'miscellany' . See Ben Schott's Original Miscellany, and follow-on books. One stand-out is 'Untimely Deaths of Pop Stars' with columns for recording 'Overdose', 'Defenestration' etc. (Check all that apply.) It also organizes weird units of measure, 50 US state conventions for dashed road lines (great example of graphical chart) and day of the week toasts onboard a ship.

rmunn|1 month ago

But does the article include a handy list of How to Recognise Different Types of Trees from Quite a Long Way Away?

rplnt|1 month ago

However obscure this page might be, I was there just a few days ago. Clicked on it from this article about a tree that was cut down, and it was apparently a big thing in the UK. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sycamore_Gap_tree

vanderZwan|1 month ago

I remember that incident! As a side-effect I discovered that beautiful panorama picture[0], which was perfect for my two-monitors-plus-laptop-screen set-up aside from the low resolution, so I used my stippling notebook[1] to hide that a little bit[2]. I could probably tweak the stippling settings a bit to have prettier output, but it's been my wallpaper for over two years now.

[0] https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/5/56/Sycamore...

[1] https://observablehq.com/@jobleonard/a-fast-colored-stipple-...

[2] https://blindedcyclops.neocities.org/sycamore_gap_tree_pano/... https://blindedcyclops.neocities.org/sycamore_gap_tree_pano/... https://blindedcyclops.neocities.org/sycamore_gap_tree_pano/...

hopelite|1 month ago

The saddest part of this is that we really have no idea just how many or the oldest redwood trees that were felled in California and on the western cost of the USA that were possibly multiple thousands of years old, i.e., 4000 years, possibly even 6000 years based on old images and accounts of trees, and that's just what we do have signals about.

Side note; there are several places in Europe where Sequoias were planted at various times and are basically infants at 150-200 years old, having been brought back to Europe by explorers and aristocrats.

madcaptenor|1 month ago

One tree I'm surprised not to see here - the tree that Newton sat under that supposedly hit him on the head with an apple.

FarmerPotato|1 month ago

I'm sure everybody could name local examples of Trees of Mild Renown.

Mine is the Jollyman Oak, which stood in Jollyman Park on Stelling Road, Cupertino and was 160 years old before residential re-development crushed its root system.

I heard about its death via Facebook.

felineflock|1 month ago

I clicked expecting some catalog of data structures but it was a pleasant surprise.

hahahahhaah|1 month ago

Includes Martin Fowler's strangler fig. Yes it is a design pattern and a tree.

ETH_start|1 month ago

It would be interesting to see the list of past trees. The most famous I can think of Donar's Oak (also called Thor's Oak), which was revered by Germanic pagans, and felled by Saint Boniface.

kilroy123|1 month ago

Slightly off topic but does anyone know where to get a huge dataset of tree images? I'm talking millions.

mon_|1 month ago

There are surely more trees than this

vacuity|1 month ago

If I haven't seen them, then they don't exist.

_kb|1 month ago

And here I was excited to see disjoint subtrees of Wikipedia's articles.

zahlman|1 month ago

Interesting to me how many of the European examples are yews and oaks.

kreeben|1 month ago

Why is Pippi Longstocking's "soda pop tree" not on the list? It's dying and the whole of Sweden are freaking out. We're putting tax payer money on solving its disease. We're developing a vaccine to try and save it for gods sake. Yes, this is a very LOL type of situation to the rest of the world, I know that. But it's not a laughing matter in Sweden: https://www.slu.se/nyheter/2025/11/pippis-sockerdrickstrad-r...

thinkingemote|1 month ago

Does the tree have a Wikipedia article about it? If not you can add it. If it does, you can add it to the list.

Wikipedia allows anyone to edit and contribute! (although many users don't know that and a smaller than miniscule amount of users actually do.)

xg15|1 month ago

I was unreasonably excited they included Pando.

dfedbeef|1 month ago

This is why Wikipedia is great.

campital|1 month ago

Is this list comprehensive?

technothrasher|1 month ago

How could it be? Growing up, there was a large horse chestnut tree that was a meeting point for all the kids in the neighborhood. It was such a huge part of our lives that it became an icon for our childhood, as several others have agreed with me as adults. It's gone now, as it grew old and diseased and someone cut it down. But it was a very significant tree for many people in the town for many years. I doubt, however, that it, or so many other trees that had similar impact on people, would ever make a Wikipedia list. There are just too many trees.

adzm|1 month ago

No, but you can add anything missing if you have a source!

nephihaha|1 month ago

It can never be. There are many notable trees, but some of them will never have a Wikipedia article.

1970-01-01|1 month ago

I asked ChatGPT to infer some facts from this list and it hallucinated an entire tree.

quijoteuniv|1 month ago

Nice! Includes Mythological and religious trees!