[CJefferson]

But cloudflare do block things. They tend to block things as a rule the American government wants blocking.

The problem is they want to be the people who choose what gets blocked, rather than elected governments.

To me, this whole thing is crazy, certainly pull out if you like, but I'm shocked how many people seem to be siding with the profit-making company over an elected government.

[rtsam]

I can confirm that. Got blocked due to a frivolous report. Cloudflare blocked me and categorized my site as phishing. (censoring me from anyone that uses their systems to browse)

No support. No responses to emails or requests for a review by a human

They also sent a notice to my hosting provider. My hosting provider promptly looked at my site and closed the ticket. It was pretty clear to anyone that the report was malicious.

So yes, Cloudflare censors (to quote Matthew Prince) with "No judicial oversight. No due process. No appeal. No transparency"

Granted this could be just due to lack of staff and support

[lccarrasco]

They requested a worldwide block, as a bolivian citizen I have not voted for any italian government officials. This article seems heavily biased, ignoring this specific point is really strange.

[anonzzzies]

I guess Bolivian people like to watch soccer live too while that match stream was paid for by an Italian media company. I am not in favour of any of this, but it is easy to defend that request? Legal or fair or not?

[rpdillon]

> The problem is they want to be the people who choose what gets blocked, rather than elected governments.

AGCOM is elected?