top | item 46647553 (no title) catoAppreciator | 1 month ago Any reason you didn't use alpine for client side interactivity? When I went down the "use a framework plugin in Astro" route, I found it too jarring and reverted to alpine which I found worked well enough. discuss order hn newest __jonas|1 month ago No, not in particular, I just like Svelte's compilation-based approach, but Alpine definitely looks nice.When the client side interactivity is very contained and small in scope I also quite like just using plain JavaScript without a framework. MatthewPhillips|1 month ago Sorry we haven't fixed this issue sooner. In this case it's a complicated CSS issue, but nevertheless I've got a fix I'm working on here:https://github.com/withastro/astro/pull/15227 load replies (1)
__jonas|1 month ago No, not in particular, I just like Svelte's compilation-based approach, but Alpine definitely looks nice.When the client side interactivity is very contained and small in scope I also quite like just using plain JavaScript without a framework. MatthewPhillips|1 month ago Sorry we haven't fixed this issue sooner. In this case it's a complicated CSS issue, but nevertheless I've got a fix I'm working on here:https://github.com/withastro/astro/pull/15227 load replies (1)
MatthewPhillips|1 month ago Sorry we haven't fixed this issue sooner. In this case it's a complicated CSS issue, but nevertheless I've got a fix I'm working on here:https://github.com/withastro/astro/pull/15227 load replies (1)
__jonas|1 month ago
When the client side interactivity is very contained and small in scope I also quite like just using plain JavaScript without a framework.
MatthewPhillips|1 month ago
https://github.com/withastro/astro/pull/15227