[betterth]

Please refrain from commenting on subjects that you're ignorant about.

"Distasteful" subreddits that consist of compromising photos of teenagers taken without their knowledge are to be tolerated."

As per http://as.reddit.com/rules/

"No child pornography or sexually suggestive content featuring minors."

These kinds of things are not tolerated on Reddit.

[tptacek]

I think if you read my comment carefully you'll discover that I didn't say "child pornography" or "sexually suggestive content featuring minors".

Are you suggesting that "child pornography" and "sexually suggestive content featuring minors" is the bright line, and that anything on the privacy spectrum that doesn't cross that line should be defended? That's the implication I get from your comment, but I'm happy to be corrected.

[bduerst]

Voltaire nailed it best with "I do not agree with what you have to say, but I'll defend to the death your right to say it."

[milesskorpen]

Alright, then, let's rephrase that a bit: "Distasteful" subreddits that consist of compromising photos of PEOPLE taken without their knowledge are to be tolerated." I'm not sure why a rule against minors suddenly makes this okay.

[mnicole]

A link to the rules isn't going to stop things from slipping through the cracks.