top | item 46650886 (no title) gffrd | 1 month ago 6016 x 3384.Dell monitor is twice the surface area with 3/4 the pixels … or in reverse: Apple display is half the size with 30% more pixels.(edit: corrected dell pixel %) discuss order hn newest zuminator|1 month ago What is going on here? Why is everyone in this thread using 'pixels" to mean ppi? It seems unnecessarily confusing or even misleading. I mean blatantly a 6K monitor has more pixels than a 5K or 4K one, regardless of the pixel density. gffrd|1 month ago Yeah, nobody’s saying a 5k monitor has more pixels than a 6k.I think what people are trying to communicate, but struggling to, is that high pixel count on a huge display can be deceptive.I think grandparent was trying to say “comparing a low-poi display to a high-ppi display is not a direct comparison.”
zuminator|1 month ago What is going on here? Why is everyone in this thread using 'pixels" to mean ppi? It seems unnecessarily confusing or even misleading. I mean blatantly a 6K monitor has more pixels than a 5K or 4K one, regardless of the pixel density. gffrd|1 month ago Yeah, nobody’s saying a 5k monitor has more pixels than a 6k.I think what people are trying to communicate, but struggling to, is that high pixel count on a huge display can be deceptive.I think grandparent was trying to say “comparing a low-poi display to a high-ppi display is not a direct comparison.”
gffrd|1 month ago Yeah, nobody’s saying a 5k monitor has more pixels than a 6k.I think what people are trying to communicate, but struggling to, is that high pixel count on a huge display can be deceptive.I think grandparent was trying to say “comparing a low-poi display to a high-ppi display is not a direct comparison.”
zuminator|1 month ago
gffrd|1 month ago
I think what people are trying to communicate, but struggling to, is that high pixel count on a huge display can be deceptive.
I think grandparent was trying to say “comparing a low-poi display to a high-ppi display is not a direct comparison.”