(no title)
martinpw | 1 month ago
My former manager used to have Dilbert comic strips on his wall. It always puzzled me - was it self deprecating humor? At a certain point though it became clear that in his mind the PHB was one layer ABOVE him in the management chain and not anyone at his level. I suspect it may be a recursive pattern.
cainxinth|1 month ago
> “Dilbert” was a war cry against the management class — the system of deluded jerks you work for who think they know better. Workers posted it on their cubicles like resistance fighters chalking V’s on walls in occupied Paris. But their bosses posted “Dilbert” in their offices too, since they also had a boss who was an idiot.
https://www.nytimes.com/2026/01/16/opinion/dilbert-scott-ada...
rbanffy|1 month ago
catoc|1 month ago
raverbashing|1 month ago
History does not repeat but it rhymes indeed
yojo|1 month ago
Did she just not get it? Or did she get it, and it was some weird flex making us watch it with her? I still don’t know.
Aurornis|1 month ago
Even your CEO has a board to deal with.
I always think it's strange when people draw a mental dividing line between ICs and managers and think people on the other side are living in totally different experiences of the world.
johnvanommen|1 month ago
Working in management is infinitely more soul crushing than being Peter Gibbons.
I literally brought up The Peter Principle when I quit a job like that.
Office Space is a parable about a software developer who doesn’t want to be promoted beyond his core competency. Peter Gibbons is fighting the Peter Principle.
tsunamifury|1 month ago
driverdan|1 month ago
themadturk|1 month ago
muyuu|1 month ago
ivanhoe|1 month ago
crazygringo|1 month ago
Plenty of managers see the absurdity in a lot of what they have to do, but it's mandated by the people above them.
tokai|1 month ago
[deleted]
barrysaunders|1 month ago
coldtea|1 month ago
analog8374|1 month ago
My boss refused to allow people to call him boss, for example. He really hated the system.
setsewerd|1 month ago
Probably not how you meant it but I chuckled.
da02|1 month ago
shadowgovt|1 month ago
- Constrained scope (they were the UI team on an internal product; by the time they got their marching orders the whole thing was a very well understood problem domain)
- Excellent manager (he has infinite calm, deep empathy for the fact that real people are messy and complicated, and an incredible nose for time estimates). There was basically no amount of pressure up-chain could put on him that would shake his cool; he seems to be completely confident internally that the worst-case scenario is he goes and lands on his feet somewhere else.
As a result, his team was basically always happy and high-performing and he consistently missed up-chain expectations set by project managers above him who had to consistently report that UI wasn't going to be delivered on the timeline they set because they had taken his estimates and shaved three weeks off of them, only to discover that the estimates were dead-on and they were the liars. He was insulated from this by (a) keeping consistently good notes on his initial estimates, everything that bumped them, and the final deliverable dates and (b) having skip-level meetings where he could present all of this to his boss's boss clearly.
tayo42|1 month ago
Though some of my worst work periods was when I didn't have a manager either lol.
cm2012|1 month ago
dfxm12|1 month ago
HPsquared|1 month ago
1over137|1 month ago
lanyard-textile|1 month ago