The ruling itself even says that every case has to be taken in context, and that particular one was a known felon who has been accused of a crime fleeing in a vehicle. As a matter of fact, if you look at the decision [1] you won't find the word "defense" once, only "fleeing".1: https://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/03-1261.ZPC.html
0xy|1 month ago
[deleted]
treetalker|1 month ago
Parent comment appears to have in mind either reasonable suspicion or probable cause to believe a felony was committed. So not identical at all — nor clear.
Also questionable whether any commands were lawful.
backscratches|1 month ago
goatlover|1 month ago