(no title)
Workaccount2 | 1 month ago
Google actually experimented with this about a decade ago (I know, I was one of the suckers who paid), but it got canned because why the fuck would you pay google when u-bloc is free?
Companies absolutely will offer ad-free experiences. Google has youtube premium, which even compensates creators with half your sub as well. Evenly distributed too.
People get wrapped around the axle of ad-subsidized models, the "I pay and still see ads" but they just are confused about a hybrid monetization structure.
At some point the larger internet has to look itself in the mirror and recognize that it's either ads, credit card, or a hybrid of those.
And no, blocking is not an option, it just offloads costs onto honest users.
prmoustache|1 month ago
Youtube premium is not ad-free, you still gets whatever ads are embedded in the actual content.
Workaccount2|1 month ago
But I don't hold youtube accountable for what creators decide to put in their videos. I would grind my axe with the creator instead, it's their video and their choice. Youtube gets no cut from those segments.
pirates|1 month ago
Bjartr|1 month ago
account42|1 month ago
That is always at best a temporary affair.
> Google has youtube premium, which even compensates creators with half your sub as well.
And those creators still put ads in their videos.
> And no, blocking is not an option, it just offloads costs onto honest users.
Ad-free is the only option I am agreeing to.
vagrantJin|1 month ago