top | item 46674045

(no title)

bcye | 1 month ago

I'm not sure how attacking Greenland would accomplish the goal of more European spending on US weapons.

discuss

order

m000|1 month ago

If indeed this turns out to be a ruse, Greenland conquest would not be Trump's end game. It would be just a performative confrontation to get rid of NATO 1.0. Who is really ready to start WW3 over Greenland?

After NATO 1.0 is declared dead and burried, Trump might as well backpedal and start negotiating NATO 2.0. Which would be light on US military commitments and heavy on European arm purchase commitments. And he seems to believe (not unjustifiably - see Nord Stream sabotage) that the European leaders are spineless enough to accept a NATO 2.0 deal.

This will not be unlike Trump's thinking: "I'll build a wall and the Mexicans will pay for it".

Wild theory, yes. But we live in wild times, unfortunately.