[mcherm]

Ever driven a vehicle with an automatic transmission rather than a manual gearshift with a clutch? Then you almost certainly used a fluid coupling: basically two fans in a can with oil so turning one turns the other.

The article is so full of hype it doesn't bother to explain how this is different from the "fluid gears" invented in 1905.

[jgrahamc]

As immortalised in the 1978 song "Greased Ligthnin'" from the film Grease:

    Well, this car is automatic
    It's systematic
    It's hydromatic
    Why it's greased lightnin' (greased lightnin')

I am pretty sure that "hydromatic" there is actually "Hydramatic" (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hydramatic).

[ZeroGravitas]

1978 film (based on a 1971 musical) set in 1958 with the high school kids repairing a beaten up 1948 model year car.

[donw]

If it’s a hydramatic, be careful to only lubricate it with snake oil.

[bluGill]

Many automatics these days are manual transmissions with a computer controlling the clutch. They have nothing in common with the slushboxes of old, the oil is just for lubrication.

[ROOFLES]

ZF 8HP is still a traditional torque converter transmission. Most high performance or high torque applications use that design. Dual clutch automatics or automated manuals can't take it.

[HPsquared]

Even slushboxes tend to aggressively lock up the torque converter. It's usually only in a "fluid dynamics" mode for brief moments. (Except maybe on a gentle hill start)

[MisterTea]

Maybe in sports cars but the majority of vehicles still come with hydraulic autos or CVTs.

[gambiting]

I mean, certainly the VAG group likes to use their dual clutch automatics, but "true" torque converters are still very common. ZF makes them for like a million different cars, and AISIN makes them for the Volvo and Geely group.

[Someone]

> Ever driven a vehicle with an automatic transmission rather than a manual gearshift with a clutch? Then you almost certainly used a fluid coupling

Are you sure?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Continuously_variable_transmis...:

“The most common type of CVT uses a V-belt which runs between two variable-diameter pulleys.

[…]

A belt-driven design offers approximately 88% efficiency, which, while lower than that of a manual transmission, can be offset by enabling the engine to run at its most efficient speed regardless of the vehicle's speed.

[…]

Disadvantages of a hydrostatic CVT include:

Reduced efficiency. Gears are one of the most efficient methods of mechanical power transmission, with efficiencies as high as 90 percent in many cases. In contrast, few hydrostatic transmission systems achieve more than about 65 percent efficiency”

[mjmas]

CVT != Automatic transmission (which is generally hydraulic)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Automatic_transmission#Hydraul...

[raynr]

There are also DCTs which IIRC don't use a torque converter. But chances are pretty good that an automatic transmission car uses a torque converter.

[formerly_proven]

A hydrostatic CVT is not a torque-converter transmission (which is hydrodynamic). A hydrostatic CVT is basically a hydraulic pump, control valves plus hydraulic motor. So what you would typically find on construction or forest equipment.

[ErroneousBosh]

Except a fluid clutch actually works, and a torque converter works even better and has three fans inside it ;-)

I can see the "passive" cylinder getting dragged around a little by viscosity but I don't see how this could transfer even the tiniest amount of power.

[yason]

Yeah, and like it's name a torque converter can actually not only transmit torque as well but also convert rpms to torque. Running the engine at high rpm at standstill converts revolutions of the input shaft to torque on the output shaft, thus allowing the car to start accelerating at slow speed but with high torque, operating without a clutch.

That's as close to fluid gearing as you can imagine.