(no title)
ryan-c | 1 month ago
* Gun ownership should be much more tightly regulated in the US.
* Requiring 3D printers to block production of firearms is worse than useless.
How would that even work from a technological perspective? If it did work, why would 3d printer jailbreaks not be the immediate result? I would use jailbroken firmware on principal.
kotaKat|1 month ago
[X] I AFFIRM this screw I am printing will not go in a gun under penalty of perjury
If you click the checkbox, It's Legal!(tm)
frogperson|1 month ago
I think Roosevelt had it right when he said talk soflty and carry a big stick.
crote|1 month ago
I completely your point, but unless you're willing to actually start a civil war they aren't going to be very helpful. They are, at best, a mild deterrent against indiscriminate use of lethal force.
At the same time the US is still the only country in the world which regularly sees school shootings. This was the case before Trump, and I see no reason to believe it'll be any different after Trump.
I agree that the timing probably isn't the best right now, but after fixing the completely broken democratic system gun control should probably be placed somewhere near the top of the agenda.
ryan-c|1 month ago
Also, as others rightly pointed out "much more tightly regulated" ≠ "banned entirely".
dpark|1 month ago
It’s also very disingenuous to pretend that tighter regulation implies disarming everyone.
estimator7292|1 month ago