top | item 46683077

(no title)

bs7280 | 1 month ago

You are not wrong, and I should clarify I also have a big problem with the current state of legal insider trading of elected officials, but this polymarket problem is much more extreme. You can get a guaranteed 100-1 payout by blowing up some random people on the other side of the planet. Way worse than making even 2-5x on a leveraged futures bet with insider info. In that example, the victim is usually just other rich people.

discuss

order

JumpCrisscross|1 month ago

If we want to go turtles all the way down, we could create a market to predict trading by decision makers and thus incentivize leaks from the betting markets.

eru|1 month ago

Well, insider trading should be legalised in general. It would be better for the general public.

See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Insider_trading#Arguments_for_...

graemep|1 month ago

It would deter those who are not insiders from investing as returns would shift from them to insiders.

As the biggest social benefit securities markets provide is to enable raising capital this is a huge drawback and makes things worse for the general public.

tim333|1 month ago

So if you buy stock in company A, have it go to zero because the business went bust, find the CEO already knew it was bust when he was selling the stock to you, you'd be fine with that?