[9JollyOtter]

> And that is wrong. It's even better than the "cash cow" it used to be, I provided some values of what Windows brings in over the years, and it has grown and grown. You ignored that.

No and I've never ignored it. As the revenue percentage decreases because it is growing slow. It will become less important.

Relatively it isn't as much of a cash cow, which I explained ad-nauseam to you.

> You seriously do not.

It is correct enough for all intents and purposes. You are quibbling over semantics. It is totally unnecessary and pedantic.

> You are reported.

I don't care. If you make arrogant little statements like that, expect that response.

[leptons]

>I don't care. If you make arrogant little statements like that, expect that response.

Okay, Mr 6-day old account. I'm sure you'll just create another one when this one gets banned (again).

Your insistence that you are correct even in the face of evidence to the contrary tells me I'm done with this conversation, completely. Goodbye.